Knowledge is Power
BARE METAL CYBERKnowledge is Power

Sitewide Search

Search Bare Metal Cyber

Search courses, individual lessons, wiki entries, books, podcasts, magazine articles, Daily Cyber News, and Darwin.

NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced CUI Protection Center

03.01.07E — Automated Audit Actions for Account Management

Read the official CUI requirement and assessment content, then use the separately labeled Bare Metal Cyber perspective to connect it to implementation, evidence, and sustained operation.

1Source controls
5Assessment objectives
3Assessment methods

03.01 — Access Control · NIST SP 800-172 Revision 3

Active
Official NIST requirement content

Security requirement

Use automated mechanisms to audit account creation, modification, enabling, disabling, and removal actions.

Official NIST discussion

Discussion

The use of automated mechanisms to audit account management activities provides more timely and comprehensive data to guide and inform needed actions by system administrators. Security information and event management (SIEM) tools can help automate account management audit activities. This requirement enhances SP 800-171 requirement 03.01.01.

Official protection strategy classifications

Protection strategies supported

These classifications are carried from the official SP 800-172 OSCAL record and help explain the enhanced requirement’s defensive purpose.

PS-DLODamage-Limiting Operations
PS-PRAPenetration-Resistant Architecture
Bare Metal Cyber interpretation

Implementation perspective

Treat Automated Audit Actions for Account Management as an enhanced CUI protection outcome for elevated threat conditions that must be reflected in the system boundary, documented implementation, operational behavior, and assessment evidence. Pay particular attention to approved identities, least privilege, remote access, information flow, and the full account lifecycle.

  1. Confirm the federal agency selected this enhanced requirement for the critical program or high-value asset and identify the CUI system components, services, users, and external connections in scope.
  2. Resolve every organization-defined parameter through an approved governance and tailoring process.
  3. Map each clause of the requirement to an accountable owner, implementation mechanism, and evidence source.
  4. Verify that inherited and shared implementations are supported by current provider evidence and responsibility boundaries.
  5. Collect evidence during normal operation and review changes, exceptions, and deficiencies on a risk-based cadence.

Questions to ask

  • Which critical-program or high-value-asset CUI, data flows, users, and services are protected by this enhanced requirement?
  • Which portions are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable, and what evidence supports that determination?
  • Do the system security plan, deployed configuration, operating process, and assessment evidence tell the same story?
  • What change, incident, or threshold should trigger reassessment?

Evidence and validation

  • access authorization and approval records
  • account inventories and entitlement exports
  • access review results
  • authentication and authorization logs

Common failure patterns

  • CUI access that exceeds mission need
  • shared or orphaned accounts
  • remote access paths outside the approved boundary
  • access reviews that cannot be reconciled to deployed permissions
Official NIST SP 800-172A content

Assessment objectives and methods

Assessment objectives (5)

  1. automated mechanisms are used to audit account creation actions.

  2. automated mechanisms are used to audit account modification actions.

  3. automated mechanisms are used to audit account enabling actions.

  4. automated mechanisms are used to audit account disabling actions.

  5. automated mechanisms are used to audit account removal actions.

Examine

  • Access control policy
  • procedures addressing account management
  • system design documentation
  • system configuration settings and associated documentation
  • notifications or alerts of account creation, modification, enabling, disabling, and removal actions
  • system audit records
  • system security plan
  • other relevant documents or records

Interview

  • Personnel with account management responsibilities
  • system/network administrators
  • personnel with information security responsibilities

Test

  • Automated mechanisms implementing account management functions
Official source-control relationships

Source NIST SP 800-53 controls

These controls are referenced by the official SP 800-172 Rev. 3 OSCAL record. Open the corresponding control pages for complete control text, enhancements, D3FEND mappings, and related learning.

Source controlAC-2(4)Open SP 800-53 control →
Source record

Authoritative sources

Bare Metal Cyber is an independent educational publisher and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NIST. The official publications, the responsible federal agency, and the governing contract or agreement determine applicability, tailoring, assessment depth, and required implementation.