PM-24 — Data Integrity Board

From control text to operational evidence

Use Data Integrity Board as a testable risk decision. Translate the official statement into accountable people, repeatable processes, configured technology, and evidence that demonstrates the outcome over time. In this family, pay particular attention to enterprise program governance, accountability, resources, metrics, and organization-wide risk decisions.

Implementation workflow

• Define the control boundary, responsible owner, inherited portions, and systems or processes in scope.
• Resolve each organization-defined parameter before declaring the control implemented.
• Document how the implementation satisfies every clause of the official control statement.
• Collect evidence as a normal byproduct of operation rather than only before an assessment.
• Review exceptions, changes, and monitoring results on a risk-based cadence.

Evidence examples

• program charters and policies
• governance meeting records
• risk and performance metrics
• resource and responsibility assignments

Common failure patterns

• program metrics count activity instead of outcomes
• system-level risks never reach enterprise governance
• responsibilities assigned without authority or resources
• privacy and security managed in separate silos

Questions practitioners should ask

• What risk decision is this control intended to support in this system?
• Which parts are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable—and what evidence supports that decision?
• Do the documented narrative, deployed configuration, operating process, and collected evidence agree?
• What event or threshold requires the implementation to be reviewed or changed?