Knowledge is Power

Sitewide Search

Search Bare Metal Cyber

Search exact control and technique identifiers, Cyber Wiki articles, framework records, playbooks, books, podcasts, Academy courses, and individual lessons.

Cross-Framework Defense Map

AC-5 — Separation of Duties

Trace this SP 800-53 control to NIST CSF outcomes, CUI requirements, D3FEND defensive techniques, ATT&CK relationships, and related learning resources.

AC — Access Control · NIST SP 800-53 Release 5.2.0

Open the complete control page →
NIST SP 800-53 control context

AC-5 — Separation of Duties

Separation of duties addresses the potential for abuse of authorized privileges and helps to reduce the risk of malevolent activity without collusion. Separation of duties includes dividing mission or business functions and support functions among different individuals or roles, conducting system support functions with different individuals, and ensuring that security personnel who administer access control functions do not also administer audit functions. Because separation of duty violations can span systems and application domains, organizations consider the entirety of systems and system components when developing policy on separation of duties. Separation of duties is enforced through the account management activities in [AC-2](#ac-2) , access control mechanisms in [AC-3](#ac-3) , and identity management activities in [IA-2](#ia-2), [IA-4](#ia-4) , and [IA-12](#ia-12).

Read the official statement, discussion, parameters, enhancements, and assessment methods →

Outcome layer

NIST CSF 2.0 informative references

These CSF Subcategories list this base control or one of its enhancements in the imported NIST informative reference.

CUI protection layer

NIST SP 800-171 and SP 800-172

SP 800-171 requirements sourcing this control

SP 800-172 enhanced requirements sourcing this control

No relationship is present in the currently imported source datasets.
Defensive engineering layer

MITRE D3FEND techniques

Adversary layer

MITRE ATT&CK relationships

Curated mitigation mappings

Inferred behavior relationships

Experimental: These relationships are inferred through D3FEND and must be validated against architecture, telemetry, and threat context.

Show 105 additional relationships
Relationship boundaries

Use the map without overclaiming.

A CSF informative reference is not an equivalence statement. A source-control relationship is not proof of implementation. A D3FEND semantic relationship is not a product claim. An inferred ATT&CK link is a hypothesis for engineering analysis.

Bare Metal Cyber is an independent educational publisher and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NIST or MITRE. Informative references and cross-framework relationships support navigation and analysis; they do not establish compliance, applicability, equivalence, control inheritance, or guaranteed mitigation effectiveness.