Knowledge is Power

Sitewide Search

Search Bare Metal Cyber

Search courses, individual lessons, wiki entries, books, podcasts, magazine articles, Daily Cyber News, and Darwin.

Cross-Framework Defense Map

RA-9 — Criticality Analysis

Trace this SP 800-53 control to NIST CSF outcomes, CUI requirements, D3FEND defensive techniques, ATT&CK relationships, and related learning resources.

RA — Risk Assessment · NIST SP 800-53 Release 5.2.0

Open the complete control page →
NIST SP 800-53 control context

RA-9 — Criticality Analysis

Not all system components, functions, or services necessarily require significant protections. For example, criticality analysis is a key tenet of supply chain risk management and informs the prioritization of protection activities. The identification of critical system components and functions considers applicable laws, executive orders, regulations, directives, policies, standards, system functionality requirements, system and component interfaces, and system and component dependencies. Systems engineers conduct a functional decomposition of a system to identify mission-critical functions and components. The functional decomposition includes the identification of organizational missions supported by the system, decomposition into the specific functions to perform those missions, and traceability to the hardware, software, and firmware components that implement those functions, includin

Read the official statement, discussion, parameters, enhancements, and assessment methods →

Outcome layer

NIST CSF 2.0 informative references

These CSF Subcategories list this base control or one of its enhancements in the imported NIST informative reference.

CUI protection layer

NIST SP 800-171 and SP 800-172

SP 800-171 requirements sourcing this control

No relationship is present in the currently imported source datasets.

SP 800-172 enhanced requirements sourcing this control

Defensive engineering layer

MITRE D3FEND techniques

No relationship is present in the currently imported source datasets.
Adversary layer

MITRE ATT&CK relationships

Curated mitigation mappings

No relationship is present in the currently imported source datasets.

Inferred behavior relationships

Experimental: These relationships are inferred through D3FEND and must be validated against architecture, telemetry, and threat context.

No relationship is present in the currently imported source datasets.
Relationship boundaries

Use the map without overclaiming.

A CSF informative reference is not an equivalence statement. A source-control relationship is not proof of implementation. A D3FEND semantic relationship is not a product claim. An inferred ATT&CK link is a hypothesis for engineering analysis.

Bare Metal Cyber is an independent educational publisher and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NIST or MITRE. Informative references and cross-framework relationships support navigation and analysis; they do not establish compliance, applicability, equivalence, control inheritance, or guaranteed mitigation effectiveness.