Knowledge is Power

Sitewide Search

Search Bare Metal Cyber

Search courses, individual lessons, wiki entries, books, podcasts, magazine articles, Daily Cyber News, and Darwin.

NIST SP 800-171 CUI Protection Center

03.13.15 — Session Authenticity

Read the official CUI requirement and assessment content, then use the separately labeled Bare Metal Cyber perspective to connect it to implementation, evidence, and sustained operation.

1Source controls
1Assessment objectives
3Assessment methods

03.13 — System and Communications Protection · NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3

Active
Official NIST requirement content

Security requirement

Protect the authenticity of communications sessions.

Official NIST discussion

Discussion

Protecting session authenticity addresses communications protection at the session level, not at the packet level. Such protection establishes grounds for confidence at both ends of the communications sessions in the ongoing identities of other parties and the validity of the transmitted information. Authenticity protection includes protecting against adversary-in-the-middle attacks, session hijacking, and the insertion of false information into sessions.

Bare Metal Cyber interpretation

Implementation perspective

Treat Session Authenticity as a CUI protection outcome that must be reflected in the system boundary, documented implementation, operational behavior, and assessment evidence. Pay particular attention to secure architecture, boundary protection, communications security, cryptography, and isolation of CUI processing.

  1. Confirm the requirement is in scope for the CUI system components, services, users, and external connections being assessed.
  2. Resolve every organization-defined parameter through an approved governance and tailoring process.
  3. Map each clause of the requirement to an accountable owner, implementation mechanism, and evidence source.
  4. Verify that inherited and shared implementations are supported by current provider evidence and responsibility boundaries.
  5. Collect evidence during normal operation and review changes, exceptions, and deficiencies on a risk-based cadence.

Questions to ask

  • Which CUI assets, data flows, users, and services are protected by this requirement?
  • Which portions are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable, and what evidence supports that determination?
  • Do the system security plan, deployed configuration, operating process, and assessment evidence tell the same story?
  • What change, incident, or threshold should trigger reassessment?

Evidence and validation

  • network and trust-boundary diagrams
  • firewall and gateway configurations
  • cryptographic configuration and key records
  • segmentation and isolation test results

Common failure patterns

  • diagrams omitting cloud and third-party paths
  • encryption enabled without key governance
  • flat trust zones permitting unnecessary lateral movement
  • boundary rules accumulating without owner review
Official NIST SP 800-171A content

Assessment objectives and methods

Assessment objectives (1)
  1. SR-03.13.15.

    the authenticity of communications sessions is protected.

Examine

  • system and communications protection policy and procedures
  • procedures for session authenticity
  • system design documentation
  • system configuration settings
  • system audit records
  • system security plan
  • other relevant documents or records

Interview

  • personnel with information security responsibilities
  • system administrators

Test

  • mechanisms for supporting or implementing session authenticity
Official source-control relationships

Source NIST SP 800-53 controls

These controls are referenced by the official SP 800-171 Rev. 3 OSCAL record. Open the corresponding control pages for complete control text, enhancements, D3FEND mappings, and related learning.

Source record

Authoritative sources