Knowledge is Power

Sitewide Search

Search Bare Metal Cyber

Search courses, individual lessons, wiki entries, books, podcasts, magazine articles, Daily Cyber News, and Darwin.

NIST SP 800-53 Learning Center

PE-15 — Water Damage Protection

Read the official control and assessment content, then use the separately labeled Bare Metal Cyber perspective to connect the requirement to implementation, evidence, and sustained operation.

1Enhancements
0Parameters
3Baseline memberships
3Assessment methods

PE — Physical and Environmental Protection · NIST SP 800-53 Release 5.2.0

LowModerateHigh
Official NIST control content

Control statement

Protect the system from damage resulting from water leakage by providing master shutoff or isolation valves that are accessible, working properly, and known to key personnel.

Official NIST discussion

Discussion

The provision of water damage protection primarily applies to organizational facilities that contain concentrations of system resources, including data centers, server rooms, and mainframe computer rooms. Isolation valves can be employed in addition to or in lieu of master shutoff valves to shut off water supplies in specific areas of concern without affecting entire organizations.

Original Bare Metal Cyber perspective

From control text to operational evidence

Use Water Damage Protection as a testable risk decision. Translate the official statement into accountable people, repeatable processes, configured technology, and evidence that demonstrates the outcome over time. In this family, pay particular attention to physical access, facility protection, environmental safeguards, and visitor accountability.

Implementation workflow

  • Define the control boundary, responsible owner, inherited portions, and systems or processes in scope.
  • Resolve each organization-defined parameter before declaring the control implemented.
  • Document how the implementation satisfies every clause of the official control statement.
  • Collect evidence as a normal byproduct of operation rather than only before an assessment.
  • Review exceptions, changes, and monitoring results on a risk-based cadence.

Evidence examples

  • badge and visitor logs
  • physical access reviews
  • facility diagrams and sensor records
  • environmental and power test results

Common failure patterns

  • logical security assumptions invalidated by physical access
  • tailgating and visitor exceptions normalized
  • critical infrastructure not included in access reviews
  • environmental alarms not integrated into response

Questions practitioners should ask

  • What risk decision is this control intended to support in this system?
  • Which parts are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable—and what evidence supports that decision?
  • Do the documented narrative, deployed configuration, operating process, and collected evidence agree?
  • What event or threshold requires the implementation to be reviewed or changed?
Official NIST SP 800-53A content

Assessment objectives and methods

Show the assessment objective
  1. PE-15[01]the system is protected from damage resulting from water leakage by providing master shutoff or isolation valves;
  2. PE-15[02]the master shutoff or isolation valves are accessible;
  3. PE-15[03]the master shutoff or isolation valves are working properly;
  4. PE-15[04]the master shutoff or isolation valves are known to key personnel.

Examine

  • Physical and environmental protection policy
  • procedures addressing water damage protection
  • facility housing the system
  • master shutoff valves
  • list of key personnel with knowledge of location and activation procedures for master shutoff valves for the plumbing system
  • master shutoff valve documentation
  • system security plan
  • other relevant documents or records

Interview

  • Organizational personnel with responsibilities for system environmental controls
  • organizational personnel with information security responsibilities

Test

  • Master water-shutoff valves
  • organizational process for activating master water shutoff
Official relationships

Related controls

These relationships come from the official OSCAL catalog. They indicate useful dependencies or context, not automatic inheritance or equivalence.

Official NIST enhancements

Control enhancements

Enhancements add specificity, strength, or scope to the base control. Baseline badges show explicit selections in the official SP 800-53B OSCAL profiles.

Official NIST control enhancement

PE-15(1) — Automation Support

High

Detect the presence of water near the system and alert [Organization-defined: personnel or roles] using [Organization-defined: automated mechanisms].

Official discussion

Automated mechanisms include notification systems, water detection sensors, and alarms.

Organization-defined parameters (2)
personnel or rolespersonnel or roles to be alerted when the presence of water is detected near the system is/are defined;
automated mechanismsautomated mechanisms used to detect the presence of water near the system are defined;
Assessment objectives and methods
  1. PE-15(01)[01]the presence of water near the system can be detected automatically;
  2. PE-15(01)[02][Organization-defined: personnel or roles] is/are alerted using [Organization-defined: automated mechanisms].

Examine

  • Physical and environmental protection policy
  • procedures addressing water damage protection
  • facility housing the system
  • automated mechanisms for water shutoff valves
  • automated mechanisms for detecting the presence of water in the vicinity of the system
  • alerts/notifications of water detection in system facility
  • system security plan
  • other relevant documents or records

Interview

  • Organizational personnel with responsibilities for system environmental controls
  • organizational personnel with information security responsibilities

Test

  • Automated mechanisms supporting and/or implementing water detection capabilities and alerts for the system
Source record

Authoritative sources