Control statement
- a.Develop and disseminate an organization-wide privacy program plan that provides an overview of the agency’s privacy program, and:
- 1.Includes a description of the structure of the privacy program and the resources dedicated to the privacy program;
- 2.Provides an overview of the requirements for the privacy program and a description of the privacy program management controls and common controls in place or planned for meeting those requirements;
- 3.Includes the role of the senior agency official for privacy and the identification and assignment of roles of other privacy officials and staff and their responsibilities;
- 4.Describes management commitment, compliance, and the strategic goals and objectives of the privacy program;
- 5.Reflects coordination among organizational entities responsible for the different aspects of privacy; and
- 6.Is approved by a senior official with responsibility and accountability for the privacy risk being incurred to organizational operations (including mission, functions, image, and reputation), organizational assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation; and
- b.Update the plan [Organization-defined: frequency] and to address changes in federal privacy laws and policy and organizational changes and problems identified during plan implementation or privacy control assessments.
Discussion
A privacy program plan is a formal document that provides an overview of an organization’s privacy program, including a description of the structure of the privacy program, the resources dedicated to the privacy program, the role of the senior agency official for privacy and other privacy officials and staff, the strategic goals and objectives of the privacy program, and the program management controls and common controls in place or planned for meeting applicable privacy requirements and managing privacy risks. Privacy program plans can be represented in single documents or compilations of documents. The senior agency official for privacy is responsible for designating which privacy controls the organization will treat as program management, common, system-specific, and hybrid controls. Privacy program plans provide sufficient information about the privacy program management and common controls (including the specification of parameters and assignment and selection operations explicitly or by reference) to enable control implementations that are unambiguously compliant with the intent of the plans and a determination of the risk incurred if the plans are implemented as intended. Program management controls are generally implemented at the organization level and are essential for managing the organization’s privacy program. Program management controls are distinct from common, system-specific, and hybrid controls because program management controls are independent of any particular information system. Together, the privacy plans for individual systems and the organization-wide privacy program plan provide complete coverage for the privacy controls employed within the organization. Common controls are documented in an appendix to the organization’s privacy program plan unless the controls are included in a separate privacy plan for a system. The organization-wide privacy program plan indicates which separate privacy plans contain descriptions of privacy controls.
Organization-defined parameters
These values must be resolved through the organization’s tailoring and governance process. Bracketed parameter references in the control text identify where a decision is required.
From control text to operational evidence
Use Privacy Program Plan as a testable risk decision. Translate the official statement into accountable people, repeatable processes, configured technology, and evidence that demonstrates the outcome over time. In this family, pay particular attention to enterprise program governance, accountability, resources, metrics, and organization-wide risk decisions.
Implementation workflow
- Define the control boundary, responsible owner, inherited portions, and systems or processes in scope.
- Resolve each organization-defined parameter before declaring the control implemented.
- Document how the implementation satisfies every clause of the official control statement.
- Collect evidence as a normal byproduct of operation rather than only before an assessment.
- Review exceptions, changes, and monitoring results on a risk-based cadence.
Evidence examples
- program charters and policies
- governance meeting records
- risk and performance metrics
- resource and responsibility assignments
Common failure patterns
- program metrics count activity instead of outcomes
- system-level risks never reach enterprise governance
- responsibilities assigned without authority or resources
- privacy and security managed in separate silos
Questions practitioners should ask
- What risk decision is this control intended to support in this system?
- Which parts are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable—and what evidence supports that decision?
- Do the documented narrative, deployed configuration, operating process, and collected evidence agree?
- What event or threshold requires the implementation to be reviewed or changed?
Assessment objectives and methods
Show the assessment objective
- PM-18a.
- PM-18a.[01]an organization-wide privacy program plan that provides an overview of the agency’s privacy program is developed;
- PM-18a.01
- PM-18a.01[01]the privacy program plan includes a description of the structure of the privacy program;
- PM-18a.01[02]the privacy program plan includes a description of the resources dedicated to the privacy program;
- PM-18a.02
- PM-18a.02[01]the privacy program plan provides an overview of the requirements for the privacy program;
- PM-18a.02[02]the privacy program plan provides a description of the privacy program management controls in place or planned for meeting the requirements of the privacy program;
- PM-18a.02[03]the privacy program plan provides a description of common controls in place or planned for meeting the requirements of the privacy program;
- PM-18a.03
- PM-18a.03[01]the privacy program plan includes the role of the senior agency official for privacy;
- PM-18a.03[02]the privacy program plan includes the identification and assignment of the roles of other privacy officials and staff and their responsibilities;
- PM-18a.04
- PM-18a.04[01]the privacy program plan describes management commitment;
- PM-18a.04[02]the privacy program plan describes compliance;
- PM-18a.04[03]the privacy program plan describes the strategic goals and objectives of the privacy program;
- PM-18a.05the privacy program plan reflects coordination among organizational entities responsible for the different aspects of privacy;
- PM-18a.06the privacy program plan is approved by a senior official with responsibility and accountability for the privacy risk being incurred by organizational operations (including, mission, functions, image, and reputation), organizational assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation;
- PM-18a.[02]the privacy program plan is disseminated;
- PM-18b.
- PM-18b.[01]the privacy program plan is updated [Organization-defined: frequency];
- PM-18b.[02]the privacy program plan is updated to address changes in federal privacy laws and policies;
- PM-18b.[03]the privacy program plan is updated to address organizational changes;
- PM-18b.[04]the privacy program plan is updated to address problems identified during plan implementation or privacy control assessments.
Examine
- Privacy program plan
- procedures addressing program plan development and implementation
- procedures addressing program plan reviews, updates, and approvals
- procedures addressing coordination of the program plan with relevant entities
- records of program plan reviews, updates, and approvals
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- Organizational personnel with privacy program planning and plan implementation responsibilities
- organizational personnel with privacy responsibilities
Related controls
These relationships come from the official OSCAL catalog. They indicate useful dependencies or context, not automatic inheritance or equivalence.
Authoritative sources
Bare Metal Cyber is an independent educational publisher and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NIST. Official control requirements and interpretations remain with NIST and the responsible authorizing organization.