Knowledge is Power

Sitewide Search

Search Bare Metal Cyber

Search exact control and technique identifiers, Cyber Wiki articles, framework records, playbooks, books, podcasts, Academy courses, and individual lessons.

NIST SP 800-53 Learning Center

PM-8 — Critical Infrastructure Plan

Read the official control and assessment content, then use the separately labeled Bare Metal Cyber perspective to connect the requirement to implementation, evidence, and sustained operation.

0Enhancements
0Parameters
1Baseline memberships
3Assessment methods

PM — Program Management · NIST SP 800-53 Release 5.2.0

Privacy
Official NIST control content

Control statement

Address information security and privacy issues in the development, documentation, and updating of a critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan.

Official NIST discussion

Discussion

Protection strategies are based on the prioritization of critical assets and resources. The requirement and guidance for defining critical infrastructure and key resources and for preparing an associated critical infrastructure protection plan are found in applicable laws, executive orders, directives, policies, regulations, standards, and guidelines.

Original Bare Metal Cyber perspective

From control text to operational evidence

Use Critical Infrastructure Plan as a testable risk decision. Translate the official statement into accountable people, repeatable processes, configured technology, and evidence that demonstrates the outcome over time. In this family, pay particular attention to enterprise program governance, accountability, resources, metrics, and organization-wide risk decisions.

Implementation workflow

  • Define the control boundary, responsible owner, inherited portions, and systems or processes in scope.
  • Resolve each organization-defined parameter before declaring the control implemented.
  • Document how the implementation satisfies every clause of the official control statement.
  • Collect evidence as a normal byproduct of operation rather than only before an assessment.
  • Review exceptions, changes, and monitoring results on a risk-based cadence.

Evidence examples

  • program charters and policies
  • governance meeting records
  • risk and performance metrics
  • resource and responsibility assignments

Common failure patterns

  • program metrics count activity instead of outcomes
  • system-level risks never reach enterprise governance
  • responsibilities assigned without authority or resources
  • privacy and security managed in separate silos

Questions practitioners should ask

  • What risk decision is this control intended to support in this system?
  • Which parts are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable—and what evidence supports that decision?
  • Do the documented narrative, deployed configuration, operating process, and collected evidence agree?
  • What event or threshold requires the implementation to be reviewed or changed?
Official NIST SP 800-53A content

Assessment objectives and methods

Show the assessment objective
  1. PM-08[01]information security issues are addressed in the development of a critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan;
  2. PM-08[02]information security issues are addressed in the documentation of a critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan;
  3. PM-08[03]information security issues are addressed in the update of a critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan;
  4. PM-08[04]privacy issues are addressed in the development of a critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan;
  5. PM-08[05]privacy issues are addressed in the documentation of a critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan;
  6. PM-08[06]privacy issues are addressed in the update of a critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan.

Examine

  • Information security program plan
  • privacy program plan
  • critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan
  • procedures addressing the development, documentation, and updating of the critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan
  • HSPD 7
  • National Infrastructure Protection Plan
  • other relevant documents or records

Interview

  • Organizational personnel with information security and privacy program planning and plan implementation responsibilities
  • organizational personnel responsible for developing, documenting, and updating the critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan
  • organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities

Test

  • Organizational processes for developing, documenting, and updating the critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan
  • mechanisms supporting the development, documentation, and updating of the critical infrastructure and key resources protection plan
Official relationships

Related controls

These relationships come from the official OSCAL catalog. They indicate useful dependencies or context, not automatic inheritance or equivalence.

Source record

Authoritative sources