Control statement
Protect the [Organization-defined: sc-28_odp.01] of the following information at rest: [Organization-defined: information at rest].
Discussion
Information at rest refers to the state of information when it is not in process or in transit and is located on system components. Such components include internal or external hard disk drives, storage area network devices, or databases. However, the focus of protecting information at rest is not on the type of storage device or frequency of access but rather on the state of the information. Information at rest addresses the confidentiality and integrity of information and covers user information and system information. System-related information that requires protection includes configurations or rule sets for firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention systems, filtering routers, and authentication information. Organizations may employ different mechanisms to achieve confidentiality and integrity protections, including the use of cryptographic mechanisms and file share scanning. Integrity protection can be achieved, for example, by implementing write-once-read-many (WORM) technologies. When adequate protection of information at rest cannot otherwise be achieved, organizations may employ other controls, including frequent scanning to identify malicious code at rest and secure offline storage in lieu of online storage.
Organization-defined parameters
These values must be resolved through the organization’s tailoring and governance process. Bracketed parameter references in the control text identify where a decision is required.
From control text to operational evidence
Use Protection of Information at Rest as a testable risk decision. Translate the official statement into accountable people, repeatable processes, configured technology, and evidence that demonstrates the outcome over time. In this family, pay particular attention to secure architecture, boundary protection, communications protection, cryptography, and system isolation.
Implementation workflow
- Define the control boundary, responsible owner, inherited portions, and systems or processes in scope.
- Resolve each organization-defined parameter before declaring the control implemented.
- Document how the implementation satisfies every clause of the official control statement.
- Collect evidence as a normal byproduct of operation rather than only before an assessment.
- Review exceptions, changes, and monitoring results on a risk-based cadence.
Evidence examples
- network and trust-boundary diagrams
- firewall and gateway configurations
- cryptographic configuration and key records
- segmentation and isolation test results
Common failure patterns
- diagrams omit cloud and third-party paths
- encryption enabled without key governance
- flat trust zones allow unnecessary lateral movement
- boundary rules accumulate without owner review
Questions practitioners should ask
- What risk decision is this control intended to support in this system?
- Which parts are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable—and what evidence supports that decision?
- Do the documented narrative, deployed configuration, operating process, and collected evidence agree?
- What event or threshold requires the implementation to be reviewed or changed?
Assessment objectives and methods
Show the assessment objective
the [Organization-defined: sc-28_odp.01] of [Organization-defined: information at rest] is/are protected.
Examine
- System and communications protection policy
- procedures addressing the protection of information at rest
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- cryptographic mechanisms and associated configuration documentation
- list of information at rest requiring confidentiality and integrity protections
- system security plan
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- System/network administrators
- organizational personnel with information security responsibilities
- system developer
Test
- Mechanisms supporting and/or implementing confidentiality and integrity protections for information at rest
Related controls
These relationships come from the official OSCAL catalog. They indicate useful dependencies or context, not automatic inheritance or equivalence.
Control enhancements
Enhancements add specificity, strength, or scope to the base control. Baseline badges show explicit selections in the official SP 800-53B OSCAL profiles.
SC-28(1) — Cryptographic Protection
Implement cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure and modification of the following information at rest on [Organization-defined: system components or media]: [Organization-defined: information].
Official discussion
The selection of cryptographic mechanisms is based on the need to protect the confidentiality and integrity of organizational information. The strength of mechanism is commensurate with the security category or classification of the information. Organizations have the flexibility to encrypt information on system components or media or encrypt data structures, including files, records, or fields.
Organization-defined parameters (2)
Assessment objectives and methods
- SC-28(01)[01]cryptographic mechanisms are implemented to prevent unauthorized disclosure of [Organization-defined: information] at rest on [Organization-defined: system components or media];
- SC-28(01)[02]cryptographic mechanisms are implemented to prevent unauthorized modification of [Organization-defined: information] at rest on [Organization-defined: system components or media].
Examine
- System and communications protection policy
- procedures addressing the protection of information at rest
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- cryptographic mechanisms and associated configuration documentation
- system audit records
- system security plan
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- System/network administrators
- organizational personnel with information security responsibilities
- system developer
Test
- Cryptographic mechanisms implementing confidentiality and integrity protections for information at rest
Related controls
SC-28(2) — Offline Storage
Remove the following information from online storage and store offline in a secure location: [Organization-defined: information].
Official discussion
Removing organizational information from online storage to offline storage eliminates the possibility of individuals gaining unauthorized access to the information through a network. Therefore, organizations may choose to move information to offline storage in lieu of protecting such information in online storage.
Organization-defined parameters (1)
Assessment objectives and methods
- SC-28(02)[01][Organization-defined: information] is removed from online storage;
- SC-28(02)[02][Organization-defined: information] is stored offline in a secure location.
Examine
- System and communications protection policy
- procedures addressing the protection of information at rest
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- cryptographic mechanisms and associated configuration documentation
- offline storage locations for information at rest
- system audit records
- system security plan
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- System/network administrators
- organizational personnel with information security responsibilities
Test
- Mechanisms supporting and/or implementing the removal of information from online storage
- mechanisms supporting and/or implementing storage of information offline
SC-28(3) — Cryptographic Keys
Provide protected storage for cryptographic keys [Organization-defined: sc-28.03_odp.01].
Official discussion
A Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is an example of a hardware-protected data store that can be used to protect cryptographic keys.
Organization-defined parameters (2)
Assessment objectives and methods
protected storage for cryptographic keys is provided using [Organization-defined: sc-28.03_odp.01].
Examine
- System and communications protection policy
- procedures addressing the protection of information at rest
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- cryptographic mechanisms and associated configuration documentation
- system audit records
- system security plan
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- System/network administrators
- organizational personnel with information security responsibilities
Test
- Mechanisms supporting and/or implementing hardware-based key store protection
Related controls
Authoritative sources
- OMB A-130 ↗
- SP 800-56A ↗
- SP 800-56B ↗
- SP 800-56C ↗
- SP 800-57-1 ↗
- SP 800-57-2 ↗
- SP 800-57-3 ↗
- SP 800-111 ↗
- SP 800-124 ↗
Bare Metal Cyber is an independent educational publisher and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NIST. Official control requirements and interpretations remain with NIST and the responsible authorizing organization.