Control statement
- a.Monitor [Organization-defined: open-source information and/or information sites] [Organization-defined: frequency] for evidence of unauthorized disclosure of organizational information; and
- b.If an information disclosure is discovered:
- 1.Notify [Organization-defined: personnel or roles] ; and
- 2.Take the following additional actions: [Organization-defined: additional actions].
Discussion
Unauthorized disclosure of information is a form of data leakage. Open-source information includes social networking sites and code-sharing platforms and repositories. Examples of organizational information include personally identifiable information retained by the organization or proprietary information generated by the organization.
Organization-defined parameters
These values must be resolved through the organization’s tailoring and governance process. Bracketed parameter references in the control text identify where a decision is required.
From control text to operational evidence
Use Monitoring for Information Disclosure as a testable risk decision. Translate the official statement into accountable people, repeatable processes, configured technology, and evidence that demonstrates the outcome over time. In this family, pay particular attention to audit event design, trustworthy collection, retention, review, and investigation support.
Implementation workflow
- Define the control boundary, responsible owner, inherited portions, and systems or processes in scope.
- Resolve each organization-defined parameter before declaring the control implemented.
- Document how the implementation satisfies every clause of the official control statement.
- Collect evidence as a normal byproduct of operation rather than only before an assessment.
- Review exceptions, changes, and monitoring results on a risk-based cadence.
Evidence examples
- logging standards and event-selection decisions
- sample audit records and retention settings
- time-synchronization evidence
- alert and review records
Common failure patterns
- collecting logs without defined use cases
- critical events missing from the audit trail
- retention shorter than investigative needs
- logs accessible to the same administrators being monitored
Questions practitioners should ask
- What risk decision is this control intended to support in this system?
- Which parts are implemented locally, inherited, shared, or not applicable—and what evidence supports that decision?
- Do the documented narrative, deployed configuration, operating process, and collected evidence agree?
- What event or threshold requires the implementation to be reviewed or changed?
Assessment objectives and methods
Show the assessment objective
- AU-13a.[Organization-defined: open-source information and/or information sites] is/are monitored [Organization-defined: frequency] for evidence of unauthorized disclosure of organizational information;
- AU-13b.
- AU-13b.01[Organization-defined: personnel or roles] are notified if an information disclosure is discovered;
- AU-13b.02[Organization-defined: additional actions] are taken if an information disclosure is discovered.
Examine
- Audit and accountability policy
- system security plan
- privacy plan
- procedures addressing information disclosure monitoring
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- monitoring records
- system audit records
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- Organizational personnel with responsibilities for monitoring open-source information and/or information sites
- organizational personnel with security and privacy responsibilities
Test
- Mechanisms implementing monitoring for information disclosure
Related controls
These relationships come from the official OSCAL catalog. They indicate useful dependencies or context, not automatic inheritance or equivalence.
Control enhancements
Enhancements add specificity, strength, or scope to the base control. Baseline badges show explicit selections in the official SP 800-53B OSCAL profiles.
AU-13(1) — Use of Automated Tools
Monitor open-source information and information sites using [Organization-defined: automated mechanisms].
Official discussion
Automated mechanisms include commercial services that provide notifications and alerts to organizations and automated scripts to monitor new posts on websites.
Organization-defined parameters (1)
Assessment objectives and methods
open-source information and information sites are monitored using [Organization-defined: automated mechanisms].
Examine
- Audit and accountability policy
- system security plan
- privacy plan
- procedures addressing information disclosure monitoring
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- automated monitoring tools
- system audit records
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- Organizational personnel with responsibilities for monitoring information disclosures
- organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities
Test
- Automated mechanisms implementing monitoring for information disclosure
AU-13(2) — Review of Monitored Sites
Review the list of open-source information sites being monitored [Organization-defined: frequency].
Official discussion
Reviewing the current list of open-source information sites being monitored on a regular basis helps to ensure that the selected sites remain relevant. The review also provides the opportunity to add new open-source information sites with the potential to provide evidence of unauthorized disclosure of organizational information. The list of sites monitored can be guided and informed by threat intelligence of other credible sources of information.
Organization-defined parameters (1)
Assessment objectives and methods
the list of open-source information sites being monitored is reviewed [Organization-defined: frequency].
Examine
- Audit and accountability policy
- system security plan
- privacy plan
- procedures addressing information disclosure monitoring
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- reviews for open-source information sites being monitored
- system audit records
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- Organizational personnel with responsibilities for monitoring open-source information sites
- organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities
Test
- Mechanisms implementing monitoring for information disclosure
AU-13(3) — Unauthorized Replication of Information
Employ discovery techniques, processes, and tools to determine if external entities are replicating organizational information in an unauthorized manner.
Official discussion
The unauthorized use or replication of organizational information by external entities can cause adverse impacts on organizational operations and assets, including damage to reputation. Such activity can include the replication of an organizational website by an adversary or hostile threat actor who attempts to impersonate the web-hosting organization. Discovery tools, techniques, and processes used to determine if external entities are replicating organizational information in an unauthorized manner include scanning external websites, monitoring social media, and training staff to recognize the unauthorized use of organizational information.
Assessment objectives and methods
discovery techniques, processes, and tools are employed to determine if external entities are replicating organizational information in an unauthorized manner.
Examine
- Audit and accountability policy
- system security plan
- privacy plan
- procedures addressing information disclosure monitoring
- procedures addressing information replication
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
- system audit records
- training resources for staff to recognize the unauthorized use of organizational information
- other relevant documents or records
Interview
- Organizational personnel with responsibilities for monitoring unauthorized replication of information
- organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities
Test
- Discovery tools for identifying unauthorized information replication
Authoritative sources
Bare Metal Cyber is an independent educational publisher and is not affiliated with or endorsed by NIST. Official control requirements and interpretations remain with NIST and the responsible authorizing organization.